|

|
Group
Journal
On
this page we once kept some running notes of our past gatherings, including
what we discussed and explored. For all entries past February 22, 2007, please
see our new journal blog by clicking HERE.
February
22, 2007:
Tom Brucia and Daniel Strain were
joined for the first time by Humanist Minister Ross Henry. After
contemplation we discovered that the coffee shop visited last time was
actually well within easy walking distance.
From Daniel:
The Contemplatives Club has been an enjoyable experience, but I think
some adjustments may be needed to allow it to continue developing in the
direction originally hoped for.
For instance, we went
to the coffee shop last time because of the rain and cold, but this more
recent time the weather was good and we seemed to go simply because of
the seating (or lack thereof) outside the chapel. But the reason the
chapel was chosen is because it is a spiritual, serene setting more conducive
to the type of feel and content we're going for with the Humanist
Contemplative concept (and the difference both locations have made in
both the feel and the direction of our conversations seems to me very
noticeable).
Being at the coffee
shop seems to encourage a type of encounter that is more social and
ordinary, like one of our coffee socials - and that is not the unique
direction we're aiming for either. Therefore, to make the situation more
suitable, I'm going to try and get some folding chairs for our next
session. This should be more comfortable than sitting on the ground as
we have done in the past. Should we try other locations in the future
(which we have always planned to do at times), then I'd hope it would be
other similar natural or spiritual settings such as the park or an
elegant indoor setting. Not, for example, in a meeting room, library, or
other common meeting place as experienced in the usual Humanist
meetings.
In addition to setting
I think our open discussions are not yet achieving the sense of
continuity and progress in personal development originally conceived. I
think a solution to this might be to rotate having one person serve as
our 'guide' for the evening. This person would present a matter for us
to engage and deliberate in, perhaps bringing some materials if needed
or desired. The subjects chosen by the guide should always be first an
foremost on a personal self improvement, or mutual support level.
Many of our unguided conversations have veered into abstract philosophic
concepts. Although, we have been able to keep conversations at a
very patient and listening level, of which I am proud. Perhaps with a
rotating guide we can get more out of the group. I'd very much like to
hear the thoughts of the other attendees on this.
From Ross:
I agree with you. over the past couple of years, I have been sitting
with the Zen Mind Buddhist Sangha almost every Sunday night and have
found their format conducive to contemplation or Meditation. We begin
with an incense lighting and traditional homage to the Buddha. When it
was my turn to lead, I composed my own "humanist words" to
begin our Meditation practice:
"In
gratitude we release this fragrance in memory of the Buddha, and all the
enlightened ones, who have passed through our history enriching us with
their wisdom.
May it
remind us, by its aroma, to pause in our lives when we encounter the
fragrances of the world of nature and revel in the wonder that gives
rise to them.
May
we, as companions to the Buddhas who have preceded us and those who yet
dwell among us, be awakened to and led by their wisdom and by our
meditations.
May
our own understanding slowly ripen as we awaken to the joys and wonders
of this, Earth, this real & awesome planet, our own true home."
We would
then sit in silent meditation for 20 minutes.
We would then break from the meditation for a brief silent walking
meditation.
And then return to our cushions or chairs for another 20 minutes of
meditation.
After that
the person assigned to lead the group on that night would read something
from the Buddhist literature that they thought would be of interest and
hopefully would lead to thoughtful responses from the group. A brief
period of discussion would follow, going around the circle, giving each
person a chance to comment on the reading. The rule was for each person to
respond directly to the reading and not to the comments of the other
persons comments.
The
sessions were closed with something called the evening Gatha:
Let me
respectfully remind you, Life and death are of supreme importance. Time
swiftly passes by and opportunity is lost. Each of us must strive to
awaken, awaken, take heed. Do not squander your life.
The Ethical
Culture Societies have a similar practice which would probably fit our
group better.
They have a
meditation practice where they sit in silence in a circle, usually in
chairs. A leader reads a passage from the wisdom literature or poetry that
is meant to induce meditation or reflection on ethics, morality, or
philosophical understanding of the self or the self in relation to the
community of other beings. or of understanding of the universe. A Bell is
rung twice to begin the period of meditation. After 10 to 15 minutes The
bell is rung 3 times to end the meditation Afterward each person in the
circle in turn is allowed to speak (or to pass without speaking)
responding to the reading, not responding to the comments of the other
persons in the circle.
Let me know
if you think any of this would fit with your idea of what the format of
the Contemplatives get-togethers should be like.
I think
that maybe the Ethical Culture approach might work for our group.
From Burt:
Personally, I prefer silent private meditation on a individual basis.
For me, that seems to be the most meaningful.
From Mark:
I must be a “yes man”. I really like the folding chairs
idea, and having a guide each meeting. Do you think it would be
fitting for me to talk about the “More To Life” program I emailed you
about earlier? There is another program I’m involved in along
similar lines [the Mankind Project].
From Tom:
1. I wasn’t in a particularly contemplative mood the other day. I’ve
found that insomnia, fatigue, and stress make me incapable of drifting
into a state of conscious reverie – and I was (and have been) in – for
reasons unknown – in those states.
Normally I
like the Rothko chapel grounds, the benches, the fountain, the bamboo, and
the quiet. (Folding chairs seem a sacrilege, but maybe that’s due to so
many bad associations in my mind.) But If not Rothko, here’s an
alternative: the art garden across from the Houston Museum of Fine Arts.
The museum charges for admission (unless you pay for an annual
membership), but even so, I miss my visits there. (No loss of interest,
just haven’t done it). I used to go to the MFAH, pick a painting, bring
a pad and pencil, and stare at the chosen work of art for a half an hour
or more. The pad and pencil? I’d let my eyes play over the oil,
identifying patterns, geometric forms, etc. buried in the composition. I’d
sketch them out, simply as reminder notes. I’d rough out blocks of
contrasting darks/lights mirroring the image itself. In other words, I’d
do all the things a visual/tactile finds restorative. Probably not
something most people would do; so be it.
2. If the
mind is part of the body, activities that influence the body should (and
do) influence the mind. What about some experiments? Fasting is an old and
very acceptable means of affecting the mind, but I’m sure members could
come up with other ways of affecting the mind via the body (music, chant,
etc, come to mind).
3.
"Many of our unguided conversations have veered into abstract
philosophic concepts." When I was 12 I went on a weekend ‘retreat’
for young men at a Franciscan ‘retreat house’. We maintained two days
of absolute silence; no words were spoken. It was a great experience.
After a few hours, the mind became quieter and quieter, and more and more
observant. Instead of a half hour of silence, what about a full day of
silence (including no TV or radio inputs, as well as no spoken outputs)
capped by a ‘breaking of the silence’ with each person allowed to
describe the experience of observing silently. In other words, NO
conversation… just verbal essays without the stresses of interaction…
4. If we
can simply toss the ideological superstructure of beliefs overboard, I
suspect we can find a lot of interesting PRACTICES in ‘traditional
religions’. (Some – but only some – have been sketched out above).
Is it time to shamelessly pilfer?
5. And
finally, what about Kurt Vonnegut’s ‘Bokononism’, outlined in ‘Cat’s
Cradle’. Are we audacious enough to practice Bokumaru, or is it simply
just too embarrassing to ‘touch feet’ as outlined in his religion for
folks lacking belief. It would be interesting for everyone to discuss
why/why not Bokononism is ‘a bunch of crap’ and whether that’s
really important. Then we could indignantly discuss why we refuse to
practice Bokumaru, and secretly wonder whether we should admit our doubts
about our indignation.
That’s
enough for now… Hope I haven’t’ lost everyone. But if I have, well….
What’s wrong with being lost? It just means you know where YOU are, but
don’t know where everyone else is…
From Daniel:
Excellent thoughts Tom. I think the role of ritual is something we
have been missing. I myself first began to think about this when I was at
a Buddhist temple and it was explained to me that the reason they bowed
before the statue of Buddha was not because they thought they were
communing with a statue, but rather it was a practice designed to get themselves
into a certain attitude, mindset, and focus.
For us, it is somewhat difficult to formulate a naturalistic spiritual
practice and ritual that is:
1) Doesn't seem like extraneous silliness.
2) Has an important function, with some examples of it actually achieving
that function.
3) Isn't so unusual that it has no hope of actually being practiced for
long by naturalists.
4) Plays some important role in adjusting our mindset and/or relationships
in real ways that improve our lives.
One ritual I have heard of that I thought was fascinating was the "drum
circle". I also like the idea of trying some walking
meditation, as Ross has mentioned. This, because it is more of a
'together' activity than sitting meditation.
When you talk about your mood lately, this also makes me think of
something about our aims with the notion of the Humanist Contemplative.
The Buddhists recognize that their practice needs to be something carried
into their lifestyle - if not, it will come back to haunt us when trying
to meditate or carry on other activities. I should say here that my own
lifestyle is very short of where I think it needs to be, and I have a lot
of habit building to do. As you can all see, my weight is not where it
should be, and that specific type of discipline (diet and exercise) is my
chief weakness. I'd also like to work more on taking philosophical theory
regarding compassion, and bringing them more into practice
in how I live and interact with others. I saw a video recently featuring a
quote by Gandhi that said, "Happiness is when out thoughts, words,
and actions are in harmony." I'd imagine we all have various areas we
need to work on in our lives, and I think working on these would be a
natural part of a contemplative program. This might mean things get a
little more personal than we'd typically feel comfortable with at most
other types of Humanist gatherings, however.
From Mark:
Personally, I don’t like ritual. It reminds me of religion a
lot. I’ve never seen the point in it. Maybe I’m just
missing something.
From Ariel:
I agree with Mark - even without looking up Webster or Wikipedia
definitions of
"ritual". To me it has an element of invoking the
supernatural, and I think it
is probably regarded that way by most people. Is there mention
(positive or negative) of that word in the AHA Manifestos 1-2-3?
From Tom:
Words have two meanings: denotation and connotation. The
first is objective, a label to tag certain aspects of reality. The
second is subjective and emotional, and totally personal. A
woman can be objectively beautiful (symmetrical face, hourglass figure,
etc) and one can find her repulsive (because she reminds one of a very,
very bad personal relationship).
I think we
should never forget the difference between 'things as they are' and how we
as individuals feel about things as they are. If we simply let
our actions be guided by connotations, the whole world is not seen as it
is, but in terms of our emotional reactions.
From Ross:
The word RITUAL s mentioned in
'Humanist Manifesto 1' in a positive sense [see below] in section 13, as a
tool for as something that needs to be reformed to function effectively in
the modern world. Rituals are a natural part of the life of all humans:
Wedding Ceremonies, Memorial Services which include Funeral Rituals,
Birthday Celebrations, Baby Naming Rituals. Graduation Ceremonies,
Installations of Officers of an organization, Sweet 16 parties, etc.. The
marking of significant events and Ritual is a universal human practice.
All human cultures practice them in some form.
I think
that what Dan is suggestion fits in with the use mentioned below:
Reforming and reconstituting ritual, leaving out the supernaturalist
elements and using them to mark the significance of an occasion.
"Certainly
religious institutions, their ritualistic forms, ecclesiastical methods,
and communal activities must be reconstituted as rapidly as experience
allows, in order to function effectively in the modern world."
In that
same section 13 Manifesto 1 also states:
"The
intelligent evaluation, transformation, control, and direction of such
associations and institutions with a view to the enhancement of human
life is the purpose and program of humanism."
I don't
think that we can escape ritual if we are to continue to live in civilized
societies, so we might as well reconstitute them [without their irrational
elements] to serve rational humanistic ends.
January
25, 2007:
Ron Titus and Daniel Strain
attended this gathering. As things were fairly cold and wet that
evening, we proceeded to a local coffee shop after our contemplation at
the chapel. There, we had a wonderful conversation over some nice hot
chocolate.
December
14, 2006:
Today's gathering, held earlier
than usual due to the holidays, was attended by David Newman, Mark
Siskel, Daniel Strain, Ariel Thomann, Ron Titus, and new visitor,
Meagan. After the usual silent period of contemplation and meditation in
the chapel, a wonderful discussion was held on the issue facing many
Humanist communities right now, regarding how we interact with our
superstitious or faithful neighbors. Much ground was made in
communicating what is, and what is not, meant by 'respect' and how this
affects our willingness and ability to act to affect positive change in
the world. These discussions were part of an overall assessment of the
new article by Daniel called "The
Humanist Contemplative" available on this site now.
Ariel also mentioned his article "Of
Cherries And Pumpkins" which has also been added to this
site, after having appeared in the latest Houston Freethought
Alliance newsletter.
November
16, 2006:
This gathering didn't take place
as usual. It seems people were distracted by the approaching holidays,
and the date had been moved to avoid Thanksgiving. In addition, the
Rothko Chapel was hosting a interfaith Thanksgiving ceremony. The
ceremony included representation of Baha'i, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu,
Jain, Judaic, Muslim, Sikh, and Zoroastrian peoples. Perhaps next year
the Humanists can be a part of the ceremony as well. The next
Contemplatives gathering will be moved two weeks prior to the usual
date, to the second Thursday of the month (December 14th) instead of the
usual forth Thursday. Hopefully this will put the date far enough away
from the holidays to work for people. Perhaps in January we might think
of trying some other meeting locations, such as Memorial Park or perhaps
a visit to the fine arts museum. We might also look into a format change
during discussion, where each person is asked to bring a short reading
that seems inspirational or informative to them in their current life
circumstances, to be read aloud and then discussed. All of this will
need to be discussed with the group to reach a consensus.
October
26, 2006:
After a silent period in the
Rothko Chapel, the weather was rainy so Mark Siskel and Daniel Strain
regrouped at the House of Pies to discuss Mark's experiences regarding
other groups and the concept of exploring our feelings and going from doing
to being.
From Daniel:
I have been considering something
more focused for our group - perhaps a program, or a collaborative
effort at exploring the concept of the Humanist Contemplative
more directly. One idea might include a joint blog or a forum to develop
and log these ideas.
Concurrently with
this, I'd like to see us touch more specifically on our personal
challenges and goals, as opposed to some of the more abstracted nature
of our discussions, which are veering more toward theory than
application. All ideas and comments are welcome.
September
27, 2006:
This gathering was attended by
Tom Brucia, Burt Greenfield, Mark Siskel, Daniel Strain, and Ron Titus.
After a nice time in thought and meditation, we had a wonderful
discussion about our views, recent considerations, and our lives, and
before we knew it, we had stayed past our usual time of 7:30pm. Burt
expressed his enjoyment of meditation, which he hadn't engaged in for
many years. Topics included the need to change pace in life once in a
while, deciding when to act and when not to, thoughts on pantheism and
our connection with Nature, the nature of consciousness, and more. Check
back here soon because individuals may be including their thoughts as well.
Daniel has made a post on his blog that addresses some of the things
touched on, and can be read by clicking HERE.
August
24, 2006:
Daniel was the only one who could
make this meeting and notice was unfortunately sent out late. However, a
summary of some thoughts considered can be found at Daniel's philosophy
blog, which can be read by clicking HERE.
July
27, 2006:
Mark Siskel, Ron Titus, and
Daniel Strain attended our second gathering. After a contemplative
period inside the Rothko Chapel, we discussed several different topics.
These included how one can better increase their experience of living
life to the fullest and what that means; the value in being as
opposed to doing; the notion of our internal judgments and how
they effect our happiness; and dealing with self-discipline. Picking up
on a thought expressed by Sheila Finch and others at the recent Ideas
Club, we also briefly discussed the idea of the Humanist narrative -
both in terms of the history of humanistic thought, as well as the use
of parables to personalize Humanist ideals.
June
29, 2006 (first gathering):
The Humanist Contemplatives Club held their first gathering on Thursday, June 29, 2006. They met at the Rothko Chapel, an ecumenical chapel used by many different types of groups. Attending were Tom Brucia, Mark Siskel, Julie Strain, Ariel Thomann, Ron Titus, and myself (Daniel Strain).
The group chatted a bit outside the chapel until everyone arrived, at which point we went inside for a period of silence. Inside, the Rothko Chapel is a large, tall room with high nearly-solid black paintings on all four walls. In the center are benches arranged concentrically. The space is very quiet and the sensation it generates varies from person to person. We all sat silently for a period of 30 minutes, which each of us spent however we liked. Some of us read, others relaxed and thought, or meditated.
After that, we went outside, sat on the grass under a tree, and had an informal discussion on what we had just been doing, general ideas about humanist spirituality is, and ended by discussing what we’re looking for in this club and why we came.
Tom had been reading Lao
Tse, the Chinese Taoist philosopher, during the silent period. He discussed Lao Tse’s observation that rigidity lends itself toward death while flexibility and a yielding gentle nature is adaptive and lends itself toward life, using the simile of dead tissue to living. This seemed to me, in some way, to touch on an aspect of what we are attempting with the contemplatives.
I brought attention to the group of an article in The Humanist by Jeff Nall which I thought we all could relate to, and said that I planned to try and reach out and network with other Humanists outside of Houston who share a similar focus as ourselves.
Ariel sat thinking during the silent period and reported that, during that time, he ceased to be aware of the ringing that he normally experiences in his ears. He also explained that one could control one’s own body in ways not often appreciated.
Mark said that he had been wanting to explore the feeling-side of Humanism and Tom made the astute observation that Humanism, if it is about humans, should include all of what it means to be human – and that means not solely addressing the rational and the analytical, but also the emotional and the introspective.
Ron expressed his thoughts on how much the role of ritual had been a part of his life when he was a priest, and how his own rituals still play a part. He explained that prior to his leaving the faith, he had always thought God was with him, answering him in a two-way conversation. But after leaving those beliefs behind he had to get used to being alone. Then he realized that, if someone had been answering him all that time, then that someone must have been himself. Ron noted that the role of the hermit and the monks, in spending time alone, is actually a practice in listening to themselves. Ron illustrated the point with the example of the Tom Hanks film
Cast
Away, in which Hanks’ character is stranded alone on an island, and creates a fictional character out of a volleyball named Wilson. He grows to need this fictional character as someone to speak with and listen to. Of course, all along, he is speaking to himself. I was reminded of many eastern philosophies which instruct us to learn to be aware of own thoughts. Perhaps this indicates an important utility to spending time listening to ourselves.
Tom concurred and expressed a desire that the Contemplatives Club allow us to simply make observations about ourselves and engage in deeper self-exploration, without the continual need for everything to be practical and immediately applicable to some rational task - much like a diver might explore the ocean below without necessarily needing to capture the fish for some immediate use. Ariel had said that, while loners are often painted as bad people, some people simply desire time to themselves and are comfortable in this.
Conversely, however, Mark noted that, to him, spirituality is about being connected to other people – making a difference in the lives of others. He had wondered at some point about his own contributions and was then made aware by a friend that he had indeed made a difference in the lives of many people. I noted that we all probably make a difference in ways more subtle and profound than we generally realize. While self exploration would seem an undeniable element of spirituality, this notion of connectedness seems an important part of spirituality too. Perhaps the self and community are two equally important sides of human spirituality?
In wrapping up with our thoughts on the club, Ariel noted that Confucianism didn’t start out as a religion, but simply as people discussing the philosophies and issues of their time. These referred to the needs of human beings in this life. I was reminded by Ariel’s words, not only of ancient Greek philosophy with its focus on living well, but also of
Gautama (Buddha), who also expressed a desire to focus on those things which matter to living in this life, and not on the purely metaphysical, which he said “[had nothing] to do with the fundamentals of religion”.
We all agreed to get together on the fourth Thursday of each month. The next gathering will be July 27th at 6pm, also at the Rothko Chapel (although we may vary location and activities from time to time). Anyone who is interested is always welcome to show up!
Please see the Participate
and Contact
pages for more information.

|